we need to change the narrative.​​​

​

In our society, rehoming or surrendering a pet is a highly stigmatized and often misunderstood loss. There is a common stereotype that only “terrible” people give up their pets, and that it’s a choice they brought on themselves.

​

It’s human nature to rely on stereotypes to help us make sense of the world. When we hear a brief snippet of a much larger, deeply complex story, we tend to fill in the blanks with assumptions that lean toward the owner as uncaring and the pet as unloved.

​

We tell ourselves we would never do that.

We firmly believe we can overcome any obstacle to keep our pet.

 

But what if, as a loving pet owner, we couldn’t?

Should we be condemned to a lifetime of shame and banned from ever owning a pet again?

 

This is why we need to look deeper.

​

Even though I’ve been in animal rescue for over twenty years, it wasn't until I began working on the owner-surrender side and saw families struggling firsthand that I realized the heartbreaking realities people face are part of a world I was clearly very isolated from. Until I found myself in a challenging pet relationship, which taught me you just can't "train" a behavior out of an animal, I couldn’t have ever known.

​

And now that I know, I can’t unknow.

And it’s changed everything for me, including understanding the very real dangers of owner shaming.​ Working with owners, I’ve learned two very powerful realities...

​

We can’t responsibly judge someone’s life circumstances based on our own.

When we have resources and support to fall back on, it’s hard to imagine a reality without these safety nets. It’s likely that others, too, once believed they would never find themselves in a difficult situation, yet here they are. Most people don't go into pet ownership with ill intent, nor do they intend to leave it that way.

​​​

It’s humbling to recognize the very real possibility that the very things we take for granted can change in a millisecond.

​

We want to believe that love can overcome every obstacle, but that’s just not where we are. The reality is that you can love your pet and still fall victim to life’s circumstances. There are systemic barriers and individual circumstances that are far larger than any individual choice.

​​​

At the risk of sounding sassy, if you don’t believe me, consider yourself blessed.

​​

Let me be clear:

I’m not here to judge anyone.

​​

Especially not those who engage in owner shaming.  It's not meant to be malicious. This is a space that evokes strong emotions - myself VERY MUCH included. Our expression of anger and frustration is often driven by a love for animals and the pain we feel when they lose their homes.

 

Lashing out at the human can feel like a way to show compassion and advocate for animals.

But it’s often misdirected.

​​

The thing is, when a pet is suffering, it’s likely their human is too.

When we’re stuck in anger, it's easy to overlook that losing a beloved pet can be one of the most significant traumas in someone’s life.  When we lean on stereotypes, we don’t see the vulnerable person behind a vague backstory who may be going through the worst time of their life.

​

And when we default to shaming a person who is already deeply struggling, we only add another layer to their pain.

 

Until I witnessed loving pet owners leaving the shelter with an unattached leash or empty carrier, unable to catch their breath through their tears, I couldn’t have known.

​

Most of us can’t.

​

And that’s okay, but it’s also why we are where we are with owner shaming.

​

Just to be clear, having observed hundreds of surrenders, I’m very aware that not every owner is emotionally attached to their pet and won’t experience a painful goodbye.

​

But what if, for the sake of those who do, we added another narrative to the conversation?

​​

One that doesn't rely on stereotypes.

One that doesn’t lean on assumptions and jump to conclusions.

One that doesn’t default to demonizing people we know nothing about.

​​

What if we introduced a narrative that fosters greater compassion and a deeper understanding of the human experience?

​​​

When we apply this lens, we may even be able to bridge the gap with proactive prevention.

This can look like:

​

Asking questions to identify the underlying need.

Offering resources that support keeping the pet-human family intact.

Sharing the post rather than criticizing it.

​​

In addition to human welfare, another unintended consequence of owner shaming is that owners are less inclined to reach out for help and are less likely to learn about resources that could have helped triage their crisis.

This helps no one. Not pets. Not people.​​